United States v. Demetrius Sears
United States v. Demetrius Sears
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED Nos. 05-10922 & 05-10923 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar November 29, 2005 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket Nos. 03-60170-CR-WPD & 03-60194-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS SEARS, a.k.a. Marcus A. Jackson, a.k.a. Michael P. Rogers, a.k.a. Adonis Ramos, Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (November 29, 2005) Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Joel D. Robrish, counsel for Demetrius Sears in these direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sears’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.