United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NOVEMBER 14, 2005

No. 04-10715 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00250-CR-T-30-MSS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANDREW STEVEN JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(November 14, 2005) Before CARNES, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Port, appointed counsel for Andrew Steven Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished