United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson
United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NOVEMBER 14, 2005
No. 04-10715 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00250-CR-T-30-MSS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ANDREW STEVEN JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(November 14, 2005) Before CARNES, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
Robert C. Port, appointed counsel for Andrew Steven Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished