U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson

United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 14, 2005

United States v. Andrew Steven Jackson

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 14, 2005 No. 04-10715 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 03-00250-CR-T-30-MSS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDREW STEVEN JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (November 14, 2005) Before CARNES, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Robert C. Port, appointed counsel for Andrew Steven Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.