United States v. Attrice Brooks
United States v. Attrice Brooks
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-11158 September 23, 2005
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 04-00241-CR-T-23-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ATTRICE BROOKS, a.k.a. Pops,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 23, 2005) Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Attrice Brooks in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brooks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished