United States v. Attrice Brooks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Attrice Brooks

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11158 September 23, 2005

Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN

________________________ CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 04-00241-CR-T-23-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ATTRICE BROOKS, a.k.a. Pops,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(September 23, 2005) Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Attrice Brooks in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brooks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished