United States v. Carline Demesyeux

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Carline Demesyeux

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

September 14, 2005

No. 04-16107

THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00013-CR-4-SPM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLINE DEMESYEUX,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 14, 2005) Before CARNES, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed appellate counsel for Carline Demesyeux in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Demesyeux’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished