U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Carline Demesyeux

United States v. Carline Demesyeux
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 14, 2005

United States v. Carline Demesyeux

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT September 14, 2005 No. 04-16107 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-00013-CR-4-SPM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLINE DEMESYEUX, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (September 14, 2005) Before CARNES, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed appellate counsel for Carline Demesyeux in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Demesyeux’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.