United States v. Cedric Bernard Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cedric Bernard Jackson

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 05-11376 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Non-Argument Calendar September 2, 2005

________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 90-00138-CR-WS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CEDRIC BERNARD JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(September 2, 2005) Before ANDERSON, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Cedric Bernard Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Jackson because, in her view, Jackson’s appeal has no merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the revocation of Jackson’s supervised release and 24- month sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished