The administrator for the Estate of Lita McClinton Sullivan (“Sullivan”) appeals the judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice counts one through nine of the Amended Complaint and count ten of the Second Amended Complaint. Having considered the briefs, and relevant parts of the record, we agree with the district court that counts one through eight should be dismissed for failure to allege facts stating a RICO claim. We also conclude that the district court properly dismissed Sullivan’s count nine claim for fraudulent transfer. See Freeman v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 865 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 2004). Finally, we agree with the district court that Sullivan has not stated claims for unjust enrichment or implied contract in count ten. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.