U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Mark Lee Foreman

United States v. Mark Lee Foreman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 9, 2005

United States v. Mark Lee Foreman

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 9, 2005 No. 03-14815 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 02-00017-CR-FTM-29-DNF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK LEE FOREMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

(August 9, 2005) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and ALARCON*, Circuit Judges. ____________________ *Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM: AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides: When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist: (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record; (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.