United States v. Cory T. Perry
United States v. Cory T. Perry
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT August 1, 2005 No. 04-12065 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 03-00050-CR-FTM-27-SPC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORY T. PERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (August 1, 2005) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cory Perry, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Perry’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.