United States v. Freddy DeJesus
United States v. Freddy DeJesus
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT August 1, 2005 No. 04-16549 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-20240-CR-DLG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDDY DEJESUS, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (August 1, 2005) Before BLACK, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: David J. Joffe, counsel for Freddy DeJesus in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and DeJesus’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.