United States v. Michael Lamont Crockett
United States v. Michael Lamont Crockett
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 28, 2005 No. 04-15109 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 03-000627-CR-P-S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL LAMONT CROCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________ (July 28, 2005) Before BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Donald E. Colee, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael L. Crockett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Crockett’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.