Moose Mountain Mktg. v. Empire of N.C.
Moose Mountain Mktg. v. Empire of N.C.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF ________________________ APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 04-16476, 04-16477 & 04-16478 JULY 28, 2005 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket Nos. 04-80230-CV-KLR, 04-80633-CV-KLR, 03-80960-CV-KLR & 00-35179-BKC-PG IN RE: EMPIRE OF CAROLINA, INC. AND EMPIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALPHA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TOYS “R” US, INC., MOOSE MOUNTAIN TOYMAKERS, LIMITED, MOOSE MOUNTAIN MARKETING, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (July 28, 2005) Before BLACK, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Toys “R” Us, Inc., Moose Mountain Toymakers, Ltd., and Moose Mountain Marketing, Inc. (“Moose Mountain”) appeal the order of the district court affirming the judgment of the bankruptcy court in three related appeals (that we have consolidated) on the ground that the bankruptcy court erred in dismissing their counterclaim and cross-claim for lack of standing to challenge the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Because we agree with the district court that Moose Mountain lacked standing to challenge the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement in the adversary proceeding before the bankruptcy court, see In Re Westwood Cmty. Two Ass’n, 293 F.3d 1332, 1334-35 (11th Cir. 2002), the order affirming the judgment of the bankruptcy court is, AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.