U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Juan A. Castro Anico

United States v. Juan A. Castro Anico
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 5, 2005 · Carnes, Hull, Marcus, Per Curiam
139 F. App'x 241

United States v. Juan A. Castro Anico

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Juan A. Castro Anico, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anico’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.