U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Aaron Jonathan Holt

United States v. Aaron Jonathan Holt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 23, 2005

United States v. Aaron Jonathan Holt

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT June 23, 2005 No. 04-15985 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 01-00010-CR-4-RH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AARON JONATHON HOLT, Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (June 23, 2005) Before CARNES, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Aaron Jonathon Holt, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holt’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.