U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Javier Sanchez-Sanchez

United States v. Javier Sanchez-Sanchez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 24, 2005

United States v. Javier Sanchez-Sanchez

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 04-12585 May 24, 2005 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 03-00748 CR-1-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Edgar Garcia Suarez, a.k.a. Edgar Sanchez Suarez, a.k.a. Julio Cesar Deconstancia, a.k.a. Hoskar Rangel, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (May 24, 2005) Before TJOFLAT AND KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges AND LIMBAUGH*, District Judge.

___________________ *Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM: AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides: When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist: (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record; (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.