[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ____________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 04-14412 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 17, 2005 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket No. 97-00196-CR-BH-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEWAYNE ANTONIZE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ____________________________ (May 17, 2005) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and GODBOLD Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Fred W. Tiemann, appointed appellate counsel for Dewayne Antonize Adams, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal because, in his opinion, there are no issues of arguable merit on which to base the appeal. Counsel*s motion is supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel*s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel*s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams*s revocation of supervised release and subsequent sentence is AFFIRMED.