[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 27, 2005

No. 04-11193 THOMAS K. KAHN

________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 02-61610-CV-WPD CARMOLITE HYPPOLITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TACO BELL CORP.,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 27, 2005) Before DUBINA, PRYOR and RONEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

After a six-day trial, the jury rendered a verdict for defendant Taco Bell on plaintiff’s claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to pay overtime. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and in granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on one claim. After full consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record before us, we find no reversible error in the trial or in the judgment based on the jury’s findings and answers to the special interrogatories.

AFFIRMED.

2