In this case, the district court granted defendant summary judgment on plaintiffs age discrimination claims brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. Record Vol. 4 at Tab 172. Plaintiff now appeals that judgment, contending that material issues of fact preclude summary judgment, and the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration.

The district court concluded that plaintiff established a prima facie case of age discrimination under the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), procedural rubric and that defendant had articulated a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision to terminate plaintiffs employment. The court then examined the record to determine whether plaintiff had shown defendant’s reason to be a pretext for discrimination. 1 After considering what plaintiff offered on this point, the court concluded that plaintiffs evidence was insufficient to permit a trier of fact to conclude that defendant’s reason for terminating the employment was a “pretext for age discrimination or that a discriminatory reason more likely motivated” defendant to discharge plaintiff. Id. at 17.

, We find no error in the district court’s conclusions, and we discern no abuse of discretion in its decision denying plaintiffs motion for reconsideration.

AFFIRMED.