U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

Layton v. Eason

Layton v. Eason
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 18, 2005
132 F. App'x 250

Counsel

A. James Rockefeller, Gomez Law Group, Warner Robins, GA, George Brian Spears, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., W. Seaborn Jones, Steven Salcedo, Owen, Gleaton, Jones & Sweeney, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Richard W. Fields, Perry & Walters, LLP, Albany, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Layton v. Eason

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:

When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.