Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp., 135 F. App'x 206 (11th Cir. 2005)

Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After a six-day trial, the jury rendered a verdict for defendant Taco Bell on plaintiffs claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to pay overtime. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and in granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on one claim. After full consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record before us, we find no reversible error in the trial or in *207the judgment based on the jury’s findings and answers to the special interrogatories.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Carmolite HYPPOLITE v. TACO BELL CORP.
Status
Published