U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles

Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 14, 2005
135 F. App'x 329

Counsel

Lawrence Allan Kellogg, Rhett Traband, Tew, Cardenas, et. al., Barton Stuart Sacher, Nancy J. Van Sant, Sacher, Zelman, Van Sant, et al. P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., William J. Sheppard, William J. Sheppard, D. Gray Thomas, Sheppard, White & Thomas, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Interested-Parties-Appellants.

Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:

When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) the judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) the judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.