U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2005

En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General

En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 30, 2005 · Barkett, Fuller, Tjoflat
144 F. App'x 857

En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:

When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:

(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.