[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 12, 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 05-15689 CLERK ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-61264-CV-MGC

VISIONS EAST, INC., a Florida Corporation, JOHN STEPHEN MORTON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

FAGERDALA THIGER MARINE SYSTEMS, AB, a Swedish Corporation, FAGERDALA WORLD FOAM, AB, a Swedish Corporation, FAGERDALA USA, INC., a Kentucky Corporation, MASTER AUTOMATION GROUP, OY, a Finnish Corporation, TARMO LINNA, PIERRE THIGER,

Defendants-Appellees. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________

(December 12, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BOWMAN,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in conducting the preliminary injunction hearing or in denying

the motion for preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

* Honorable Pasco M. Bowman II, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

2