Rafael Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.
Rafael Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ______________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 31, 2006 Nos. 06-11352 & 06-13188 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ______________________
D.C. Docket No. 04-21392-CV-DLG
RAFAEL FERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
SILVERSTONE INVESTMENTS, INC., JUAN C. MARTINEZ, JEAN MARC-ROGLIANO, ELENA FRAGA,
Defendants-Appellees.
_______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________
(October 31, 2006)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: The district court denied appellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law
notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternative motion for a new trial on the
issue of damages. The court denied the motion for judgment as a matter of law
because the evidence did not point so overwhelmingly in favor of the plaintiff that
a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the defendants. After reviewing
the relevant portions of the trial transcript, we agree with the district court and
thus affirm its ruling.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished