U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Michael Lewis Ivory

United States v. Michael Lewis Ivory
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 11, 2006
United States v. Michael Lewis Ivory

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED No. 04-12576 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 11, 2006 D. C. Docket No. 03-00394-CR-S THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL LEWIS IVORY, a.k.a. Black Mike, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________ (October 11, 2006) Before ANDERSON and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and VINSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM: After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument.1 AFFIRMED.

* Honorable C. Roger Vinson, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation. 1 We decline to address the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on this direct appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.