U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Charles Lee Taylor

United States v. Charles Lee Taylor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 27, 2006 · Anderson, Birch, Hull, Per Curiam
196 F. App'x 873

United States v. Charles Lee Taylor

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Charles Lee Taylor in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.