U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

James R. Armstrong v. Colonial Bank, N.A.

James R. Armstrong v. Colonial Bank, N.A.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 26, 2006
James R. Armstrong v. Colonial Bank, N.A.

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT September 26, 2006 No. 06-12310 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00038-CV-ORL-22KRS JAMES R. ARMSTRONG,

NANCY ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus

COLONIAL BANK, N.A.,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (September 26, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing appellants’ amended complaint for failure to state a claim for relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Record Vol 1, at Tab 26. We conclude that appellants’ claim is foreclosed for the reasons stated in the district court’s order of dismissal. Id. AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.