[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11382

January 31, 2006

Non-Argument Calendar

THOMAS K. KAHN

________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 04-00082-CR-FTM-29DNF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SENECA ORLANDO EDISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(January 31, 2006) Before BIRCH, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Hill, Jr., appointed counsel for Seneca Orlando Edison in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Edison’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2