United States v. Adrian Sandoval

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Adrian Sandoval

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-12147 January 6, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 04-00032-CR-J-20-MMH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADRIAN SANDOVAL, a.k.a. Huero, a.k.a. Guero, a.k.a. Juero,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________

(January 6, 2006)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Adrian Sandoval in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sandoval’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished