United States v. Adrian Sandoval
United States v. Adrian Sandoval
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-12147 January 6, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00032-CR-J-20-MMH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADRIAN SANDOVAL, a.k.a. Huero, a.k.a. Guero, a.k.a. Juero, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (January 6, 2006) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Adrian Sandoval in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sandoval’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.