U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Scott Brandon Heath

United States v. Scott Brandon Heath
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 23, 2006

United States v. Scott Brandon Heath

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006 No. 05-10722 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-00229-CR-J-24MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SCOTT BRANDON HEATH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (February 23, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: W. Charles Fletcher, Esquire, appointed counsel for Scott Brandon Heath, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Heath, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Heath’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.