United States v. Scott Brandon Heath

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Scott Brandon Heath

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

February 23, 2006

No. 05-10722 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00229-CR-J-24MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SCOTT BRANDON HEATH,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 23, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

W. Charles Fletcher, Esquire, appointed counsel for Scott Brandon Heath, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Heath, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Heath’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished