United States v. Nicholaz Urquiza

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Nicholaz Urquiza

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-13684 FEBRUARY 21, 2006

Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00024-CR-ORL-31-DAB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NICHOLAZ URQUIZA, a.k.a. Nicholas Urquiza,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 21, 2006) Before DUBINA, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:

Charles L. Handlin, appointed counsel for Nicholaz Urquiza, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Urquiza’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished