United States v. Nicholaz Urquiza
United States v. Nicholaz Urquiza
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-13684 FEBRUARY 21, 2006
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00024-CR-ORL-31-DAB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus NICHOLAZ URQUIZA, a.k.a. Nicholas Urquiza,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(February 21, 2006) Before DUBINA, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Handlin, appointed counsel for Nicholaz Urquiza, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Urquiza’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished