United States v. William Eugene Boyette, Jr.
United States v. William Eugene Boyette, Jr.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 05-13954 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 15, 2006
________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 04-00002-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus WILLIAM EUGENE BOYETTE, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(February 15, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed appellate counsel for William Eugene Boyette, Jr., has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boyette’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished