United States v. William Eugene Boyette, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. William Eugene Boyette, Jr.

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 05-13954 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 15, 2006

________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 04-00002-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM EUGENE BOYETTE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 15, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed appellate counsel for William Eugene Boyette, Jr., has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boyette’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished