United States v. William Eugene Boyette, Jr.
United States v. William Eugene Boyette, Jr.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 05-13954 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 15, 2006 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket No. 04-00002-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM EUGENE BOYETTE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (February 15, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed appellate counsel for William Eugene Boyette, Jr., has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boyette’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.