U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

Eileen Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 2, 2006

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-11869 February 2, 2006 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 03-01529-CV-BBM-1 EILEEN HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee- Cross-Appellant, versus FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant- Cross-Appellee.

________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (February 2, 2006) Before BLACK, HULL and FARRIS*, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

* Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. 1 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides: W hen the court determines that any of the following circum stances exist: (a) judgm ent of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an adm inistrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summ ary judgment, directed verdict, or judgm ent on the pleadings is supported by the record; (e) judgm ent has been entered w ithout a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgm ent or order may be affirm ed or enforced without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.