U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Charles Eugene Pritchett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 28, 2006 · Birch, Carnes, Per Curiam, Pryor

173 F. App'x 795

Counsel

Joseph A. Ingram, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellant., Joyce White Vance, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Charles Eugene Pritchett v. United States (11th Cir. 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Charles Pritchett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because indepen *796 dent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pritchett’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.