[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 22, 2006 No. 05-14225 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 99-00172-1-CR-CB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (March 22, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Latisha V. Colvin, appointed counsel for Anthony Bradford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bradford’s revocation of supervised release and corresponding sentence is AFFIRMED.