U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Theza Ferguson

United States v. Theza Ferguson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 16, 2006 · Anderson, Birch, Fay, Per Curiam
176 F. App'x 22

United States v. Theza Ferguson

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Rodriguez, appointed appellate counsel for Theza Ferguson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal because, in his opinion, there are no issues of arguable merit on which to base the appeal. Counsel’s motion is supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ferguson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.