United States v. Darrell Lavern Reaves

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Darrell Lavern Reaves

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 13, 2006

No. 05-13890 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-14033-CR-DLG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DARRELL LAVERN REAVES,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(March 13, 2006) Before MARCUS, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Arthur L. Wallace, III, appointed appellate counsel for Darrell Lavern Reaves, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal because, in his opinion, there are no issues of arguable merit on which to base the appeal. Counsel’s motion is supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reaves’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished