U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. James Nathaniel Plater

United States v. James Nathaniel Plater
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 1, 2006 · Carnes, Marcus, Per Curiam, Wilson
175 F. App'x 273

United States v. James Nathaniel Plater

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for James Nathaniel Plater in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Plater’s supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.