United States v. Lee Curtis Robinson
United States v. Lee Curtis Robinson
178 F. App'x 914
United States v. Lee Curtis Robinson
Opinion
Todd Hudson Seiden, counsel for Lee Curtis Robinson, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Robinson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.