U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Michelle Tinsley

United States v. Michelle Tinsley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 17, 2006

United States v. Michelle Tinsley

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-15995 APRIL 17, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 04-00110-CR-WS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHELLE TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (April 17, 2006) Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michelle Tinsley in this appeal from a revocation of probation, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Tinsley’s probation and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.