U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Jeremy Leal

United States v. Jeremy Leal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 13, 2006

United States v. Jeremy Leal

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT April 13, 2006 No. 05-15771 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00021-CR-4-RH-WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY LEAL, a.k.a. Jessey Leal, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (April 13, 2006)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Jeremy Leal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Leal, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leal’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.