U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Marvin Lavale Williams

United States v. Marvin Lavale Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 10, 2006 · Birch, Black, Barkett
175 F. App'x 299

United States v. Marvin Lavale Williams

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ed R. Haden, appointed counsel for Marvin Lavale Williams, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is *300 GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.