U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Melvin Humes

United States v. Melvin Humes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 4, 2006
United States v. Melvin Humes

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-10497 APR 4, 2006

________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN

D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS CLERK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MELVIN HUMES,

Defendant-Appellant. ________________________

No. 05-10498 ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

CARLINGTON CRUICKSHANK,

Defendant-Appellant. ________________________

No. 05-10501 ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ANTHONY COX,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ No. 05-10743 ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

SELVA HUDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 4, 2006) Before TJOFLAT and HULL, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI *, Judge.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. The vessel in issue was one without nationality that was subject to United States jurisdiction under 46 U.S.C. app. § 1903. Accordingly, we affirm the defendants’ convictions.

AFFIRMED.

* Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.