United States v. Melvin Humes
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-10497 APR 4, 2006
________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS CLERK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
MELVIN HUMES,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________
No. 05-10498 ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
CARLINGTON CRUICKSHANK,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________
No. 05-10501 ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ANTHONY COX,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ No. 05-10743 ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-20091-CR-PAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
SELVA HUDSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(April 4, 2006) Before TJOFLAT and HULL, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI *, Judge.
PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. The vessel in issue was one without nationality that was subject to United States jurisdiction under 46 U.S.C. app. § 1903. Accordingly, we affirm the defendants’ convictions.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.