U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Charles Dean Bradley

United States v. Charles Dean Bradley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 18, 2006 · Anderson, Birch, Hill, Per Curiam
184 F. App'x 821

United States v. Charles Dean Bradley

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Charles Dean Bradley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bradley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.