United States v. Daniel Gonzalez
United States v. Daniel Gonzalez
Opinion
Jerry S. Theophilopoulos, appointed counsel for Daniel Gonzalez in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 1
. Counsel’s motion to stay the briefing schedule until Gonzalez had time to review Counsel’s motion to withdraw is now moot. Gonzalez responded to Counsel’s motion on February 28, 2006, and we considered the response in our decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.