U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

Finova Capital Corp. v. FLMI, Inc. (In Re Optical Technologies, Inc.)

Finova Capital Corp. v. FLMI, Inc. (In Re Optical Technologies, Inc.)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 9, 2006 · Dubina, Hull, Per Curiam, Wilson
180 F. App'x 113

Finova Capital Corp. v. FLMI, Inc. (In Re Optical Technologies, Inc.)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, Frank Byerly and FLMI, Inc., appeal from an order of the district court reversing a final judgment of the bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy court found that Byerly and FLMI are not creditors of Recomm International Display, Ltd. (“Recomm”), the debtor, and therefore cannot be bound by the Confirmed Plan of Reorganization and the Confirmation Order. The district court disagreed, finding that FLMI potentially had two claims against Recomm: (1) fraud, and (2) breach of contract.

After carefully reviewing the record on appeal and reading the parties’ briefs, we conclude that Byerly and FLMI were not creditors of Recomm because they did not have a “claim” as that term is defined in 11

*114 U.S.C. § 101(5). The appellants have never sought any claim against Recomm, in state or federal court, and have never filed a proof of claim with Recomm. The bankruptcy court’s finding that the appellants returned the leased equipment and deemed Recomm’s debt satisfied before Recomm filed for bankruptcy are not clearly erroneous. Therefore, we reverse the district court’s order dated September 30, 2005.

REVERSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.