United States v. Michael S. Flanagan
United States v. Michael S. Flanagan
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT May 1, 2006 No. 05-16443 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00030-MC-17-TGW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL S. FLANAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (May 1, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Tracy Dreispul, appointed counsel for Michael S. Flanagan in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Flanagan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.